Subject: IJCAI-97 WORKSHOP REVIEW FORM

Comments for Author

Title:

Number:


1. How RELEVANT is this paper to AI researchers? (mark one box)

   [ ] Very relevant    [ ] Moderately relevant   [ ] Not relevant

Please explain your rating:


2. How SIGNIFICANT is this paper?

   [ ] Very significant   [ ] Moderately significant   [ ] Not significant

Please explain your rating:


3. How ORIGINAL is this paper?

   [ ] Very original   [ ] Moderately original   [ ] Not original

Please explain your rating:


4. Is this paper technically SOUND?

   [ ] Yes                [ ] Seems valid, but did not check completely
   [ ] Has minor errors   [ ] Has major errors

If there are errors, please identify them:


5. How well is this paper PRESENTED?

                             Good      Average     Poor
   Overall organization      [ ]       [ ]         [ ]
   English                   [ ]       [ ]         [ ]
   Readability               [ ]       [ ]         [ ]

If there are presentational problems, please identify them:


6. Further  comments,  advice  or   explanations  (Please   be  specific   and
   constructive, especially  with respect  to any  negative judgements  above.
   Point to the  section(s) where  an error occurs,  cite omitted  references,
   etc.) Use as much space as you need.



=====================================

      Comments for Program Committee Members Only

        (This section of the review will be withheld from the author
          eehm: Only if he is NOT a member of the organisation committee)

Title:

Number:

1. My recommendation is:

   [ ] Accept              [ ] Leaning to accept
   [ ] Leaning to reject   [ ] Reject


2. How confident are you in your appropriateness as a referee for this paper?

   [ ] Very confident - I am an expert in this area.
   [ ] Confident - I have a reasonable knowledge of this area.
   [ ] Fairly confident - I have some knowledge of this area.
   [ ] Not confident - I have no significant knowledge of this area.


3. If  this paper  is marginal  or unusual  in some  way, can  you comment  on
   anything else that might help the Program Committee reach a
   decision?



Reviewer: (please fill in your name here)