\relax 
\citation{lessmann08}
\citation{journals/ese/KhoshgoftaarS03}
\citation{me07b}
\citation{zhang07}
\citation{me07e}
\citation{me07e}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{\thepage }}
\citation{musa87}
\citation{littlewood97}
\citation{boehm88}
\citation{leven95}
\citation{lutz03}
\citation{voas95}
\citation{me00q}
\citation{lowrey98}
\citation{me99q}
\citation{me07b}
\citation{shu02}
\citation{fagan86}
\citation{shull00a}
\citation{fagan76}
\citation{raffo05}
\citation{nagappan05}
\citation{me02f}
\citation{ism06}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Background}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}How can these defect predictors be used?}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}But Does It Work?}{\thepage }}
\citation{me07b}
\citation{tosun09}
\citation{tosun10}
\citation{nach08}
\citation{weyuker08}
\citation{hall00}
\citation{journals/ese/KhoshgoftaarS03}
\citation{lessmann08}
\citation{milton08}
\citation{me10a}
\citation{me07b}
\citation{lessmann08}
\citation{me07e}
\citation{zhang07}
\citation{me07i}
\citation{me07b}
\citation{menziesgay08}
\citation{me09b}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Building Better Detectors}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}The Ceiling Effect}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Defect Prediction Mathematics}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{sec:bal}{{3.1}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{one}{{1}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{two}{{2}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{three}{{3}{\thepage }}
\citation{me08e}
\citation{me08e}
\citation{witten05}
\citation{quinlan92}
\citation{drummond03}
\citation{kamei07}
\citation{lessmann08}
\citation{me08e}
\citation{drummond03}
\citation{kamei07}
\citation{zhang08}
\citation{zhang09}
\citation{fenton00b}
\citation{Andersson07}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  The change of $pf$ with $precision$ when $neg/pos = 15$}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:precison_change}{{1}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Data used in\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {me08e}. }}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:data}{{2}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Changing the $neg/pos$ Ratio}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Over- \& under- \& no sampling results. Sorted descending by median $balance$ results ($balance$ is defined in \S  3.1\hbox {}). The right-hand side show median values (as a circle) within a 25\% to 75\% percentile range. The {\em  rank}, shown left-hand-side, come from the statistical analysis of Figure\nobreakspace  {}4\hbox {}. Three methods share top rank: NB/none, NB/under, j48/under. }}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:bands}{{3}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Statistical tests on the Figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {} results: sorted in ascending order on the number of losses (so {\em  better} methods appear at the {\em  top} of the table. First column shows a comparison of one treatment against the other eight. Two treatments have the same rank if their median ranks are statistically insignificantly different (Mann-Whitney, 95\% confidence). }}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:stats}{{4}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Breaking Through the Ceiling}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}The Distribution of Defects}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Learning from Defect Dense Components - An Experiment}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces The Distribution of Defects in CM1 and KC1}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:dist}{{5}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Component defect distribution example}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:kc1-defects}{{6}{\thepage }}
\citation{lessmann08}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces The component data for PROMISE defect datasets.}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:components}{{1}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Training on Dense Components Vs. All Components}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:dense-comp-experiment}{{7}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Experimental Results}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Dense Component vs. All Component learning - $recall$ - All Data}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:pds-all}{{8}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Dense Component vs. All Component learning - $pf$ - All Data}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:pfs-all}{{9}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Dense Component vs. All Component learning - $precision$ - All Data}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:prec-all}{{10}{\thepage }}
\bibstyle{abbrv}
\bibdata{timm1,timm2,hongyu/refs}
\bibcite{Andersson07}{1}
\bibcite{boehm88}{2}
\bibcite{drummond03}{3}
\bibcite{fagan76}{4}
\bibcite{fagan86}{5}
\bibcite{fenton00b}{6}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Result statistics per data set. The numeric value next to each treatment represents its Mann-Whitney rank, to the right of each treatment lies the quartile chart for each. Each metric is either sorted by ranking, or in the case of a tie, descending $pd$ and $prec$ or ascending $pf$.}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:metrics}{{2}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Conclusion}{\thepage }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}References}{\thepage }}
\bibcite{hall00}{7}
\bibcite{kamei07}{8}
\bibcite{journals/ese/KhoshgoftaarS03}{9}
\bibcite{lessmann08}{10}
\bibcite{leven95}{11}
\bibcite{littlewood97}{12}
\bibcite{lowrey98}{13}
\bibcite{lutz03}{14}
\bibcite{me99q}{15}
\bibcite{me07e}{16}
\bibcite{me07b}{17}
\bibcite{me00q}{18}
\bibcite{me02f}{19}
\bibcite{me07i}{20}
\bibcite{menziesgay08}{21}
\bibcite{me08e}{22}
\bibcite{musa87}{23}
\bibcite{nagappan05}{24}
\bibcite{quinlan92}{25}
\bibcite{shu02}{26}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Dense vs. All vs. Sampling - all metrics per data set.}}{\thepage }}
\newlabel{fig:plus-minus}{{11}{\thepage }}
\bibcite{shull00a}{27}
\bibcite{voas95}{28}
\bibcite{weyuker08}{29}
\bibcite{witten05}{30}
\bibcite{zhang08}{31}
\bibcite{zhang09}{32}
\bibcite{zhang07}{33}